Did You Know Red Meat Isn’t Bad For You?

Red meat has been the blame for bad health for decades now. Apparently, eating a mammal’s nutrient dense flesh is going to infect your body, give you cancer, and put you in a grave before you meet your grandchildren.

If you didn’t catch my sarcasm in the last sentence, I’m alluding to the fact that red meat isn’t as bad as you’ve been taught to think. In fact, it’s probably not that bad at all. And while I’m quite the steak enthusiast, you don’t have to take my word for it.

Let’s dissect the research together to see the honest verdict on red meat.

Defining Stuff First Just So We’re on the Same Page

When talking about red meat, I’m referring to the muscle tissue of mammals. Beef is an obvious example, but this also includes pork, lamb, veal, goat, or any Bambi like game meat you can think of.

Moreover, I’ll be calling minimally processed red meat, unprocessed and heavily processed red meat, processed. You can think of processed red meat as meat that’s been significantly altered through salting, curing, fermentation, or smoking (1). These distinctions are crucial for context and simplicity. In reality, all meat is processed to some extent, so truly unprocessed meat won’t ever enter your mouth unless you’re a farmer.

If I say red meat without distinction, I’m referring to both processed and unprocessed. Ok, now time for the article!

What’s Concerning About Red Meat?

Red meat has accumulated a horrendous reputation despite being quite innocent. Red meat’s undeserved reputation starts with it’s perceived saturated fat content. While some cuts do contain higher ratios of saturated fat than other protein sources, saturated fat is not something to worry about in an overall healthy and calorically reasonable diet as I’ve discussed in the past. Same goes with the tag along nutrient of cholesterol.

So the fat content or even the nutrient content isn’t the concern with red meat. In fact, red meat is extremely nutrient dense providing rich amounts of nutrients commonly deficient in people like protein, zinc, high quality iron, B vitamins, and more.

The concern with red meat comes from 3 specific factors that do have some truth to them:

1 – Carcinogenic Properties

Red meat possesses carcinogenic properties meaning it has the potential for cancer to form (2,3,4,5). This risk also increases with heavy charring or frying (6,7,8). However, practically speaking, the overall risk is low because red meat also possesses anti-carcinogenic properties (29).

On a similar note, you’re exponentially more likely to die from alcohol or tobacco use as opposed to red meat (1).

The world health organization has even declared red meat’s carcinogenic relationship as associations at best and not causal (1). This means there’s a link probably due to other contributing factors instead of a direct cause.

I mean, think about it. If red meat independently caused cancer, everyone biting into a hot dog at a football game would be administered to the hospital before the final touchdown.

The link between red meat and cancer exists because people who tend to eat more red meat also tend to simply eat too much food, smoke/drink more, eat minimal vegetables, and exercise less (9,10). And yet headlines decide to blame red meat when people get cancer? Go figure.

Furthermore, beyond simply living a healthy lifestyle, you can also counteract red meat’s carcinogenic properties with anti-carcinogenic pairings by doing the following:

  • Eating vegetables, vitamin C rich foods, or high polyphenol produce alongside meat or abundantly within your diet (11,12,13,43,44).
  • Marinating meat in antioxidant rich herbs, spices, hibiscus extract, citrus fruits, garlic, onions, olive oil, beer, and/or wine (14,15,16,17).

2 – Heme Iron

The second knock on red meat is the heme iron in it although all animal products contain heme iron like poultry and fish.

Nonetheless, iron as a whole is one of the more interesting micronutrients. Getting too little can diminish health and getting too much can increase your risk of certain diseases, particularly colon related (18,19,20).

Heme iron is the best source of iron in terms of bioavailability (absorption) and absolute amount. This is why it’s often linked to iron toxicity because to overdose on iron, it’s realistically only going to happen from eating too many animals carcasses not leafy greens. However, red meat is far from the highest sources of heme iron especially compared to shellfish and poultry organs, but it seems red meat still poses the greatest risk at least in observational studies (25).

Nonetheless, it’s quite difficult to even reach risky levels of heme iron or total iron in most people considering iron is one of the biggest deficiencies in the world especially in women and children (26). Children rarely get enough and women’s iron needs are significantly greater than men, especially when menstruating, pregnant, or lactating.

On top of this, athletes have even higher needs and thus are more likely to be deficient (27,28).

So while heme iron is riskier in red meat and overconsuming iron can be a concern in sedentary men, it’s usually extremely difficult to overdose in most populations.

The upper tolerable limit in average adults is 45 mg per day which is about 7 ribeye steaks (21). Furthermore, Heme also denatures when warm (like during cooking) and is discarded quickly from your blood (22,23,24). Additionally, calcium may play a protective role against heme (20). Overall, excess heme iron shouldn’t be a concern, but you can always get bloodwork to be safe.

3 –Epidemiology

Many headlines will tell you studies prove red meat is life threatening, but these are only epidemiological studies.

Epidemiology studies can’t actually prove anything. They don’t control for variables and simply observe populations thus causation can’t be drawn from them.

Red meat seems bad in these studies because as I mentioned earlier, people eating red meat also tend to live unhealthy lives as well.

It’s no surprise red meat is correlated with many health issues especially associated with processed red meat like commonly consumed hot dogs and fast food burgers (30,31,32,33,34).

In fact, epidemiology also reveals red meat only appears bad when you don’t account for veggie intake (43,44). Unless you’re doing the idiotic carnivore diet, you eating a varied well balance diet alongside red meat is fine.

Correlation Does Not Equal Causation

When looking at more controlled, comprehensive, and higher quality recent studies, a more accurate picture is painted.

  • A 2012 meta-analysis of 124 randomized controlled trials looking at lipid effects found beef to have no difference from fish or poultry (35).
  • A 2016 meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials found there was no difference in any health marker between eating less than or more than half a serving of red meat per day (36). Progressively higher red meat intake did not influence risk factors.
  • A 2019 meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials found there was no health difference between higher or lower doses of red meat in various diets (37).
  • A 2019 randomized controlled trial found red meat to have the same health effects as white meat (38).
  • A 2019 systematic review of randomized controlled trials found eating above the recommended red meat limit of half a serving per day didn’t negatively influence glycemic control or inflammation (39)
  • A 2019 review concluded any anti-meat recommendation is only based on weak cherry picked studies and that avoiding meat can do more harm than good (40).
  • A 2019 review looking at systematic reviews and meta-analyses found the evidence against processed red meat to be extremely poor (41).
  • A 2019 review (most comprehensive to date) found processed and unprocessed red meat don’t need to be avoided as there is no major risk (42).
  • A 2021 meta-analysis found meat consumption is correlated with better mental health (45). Meat consumers had less depression and anxiety than meat abstainers.

Long Live the Steaks!

So now that steaks and chops have been pardoned from their evil reputation, here are the key takeaways:

  • Red meat is rich in many crucial nutrients. it’s not mandatory to have in your diet for maximizing health or muscle growth, but it is a deeply practical, nutritious, and tasty option for those who wish to include it.
  • If you do eat red meat, it’s best to marinade it with polyphenol rich ingredients and to consume them within a fruit/vegetable rich diet. Minimizing excessively charred meat and sticking mostly with unprocessed cuts is wise too.
  • Most people need to worry about getting more iron not less especially women and athletic populations who have higher iron needs. Heme iron toxicity shouldn’t be concerning unless you’re a sedentary man with a BBQ addiction. If you have any doubt, you can always check with your doctor.
  • If you’re trying to lose weight, lean cuts are best as they’ll contain the fewest calories. Cuts with the word loin or round are usually pretty lean.
  • Achieving and maintaining a healthy body composition and lifestyle will do far more for your health than avoiding red meat.
  • Avoiding red meat completely can be harmful to your health if you’re not careful about nutrient deficiencies. Eating key types of poultry and seafood will be a good alternative. In the case of a vegan diet, supplements will be needed for practical reasons.
  • Red meat can be a part of an overall healthy and calorically reasonable diet while providing benefits with minimal risks.
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
  1. “Q&A On the Carcinogenicity of the Consumption of Red Meat and Processed Meat.” World Health Organization, World Health Organization, 17 May 2016, www.who.int/features/qa/cancer-red-meat/en/.
  2. Micha, Renata, et al. “Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk of Incident Coronary Heart Disease, Stroke, and Diabetes Mellitus.” Circulation, 17 May 2010, www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/circulationaha.109.924977.
  3. Pham, Ngoc Minh, et al. “Meat Consumption and Colorectal Cancer Risk: an Evaluation Based on a Systematic Review of Epidemiologic Evidence among the Japanese Population.” Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, U.S. National Library of Medicine, July 2014, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24842864.
  4. Kim, et al. “Effect of Red, Processed, and White Meat Consumption on the Risk of Gastric Cancer: An Overall and Dose–Response Meta-Analysis.” MDPI, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 11 Apr. 2019, www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/11/4/826.
  5. Wang, Zeneng, et al. “Impact of Chronic Dietary Red Meat, White Meat, or Non-Meat Protein on Trimethylamine N-Oxide Metabolism and Renal Excretion in Healthy Men and Women.” European Heart Journal, Oxford University Press, 14 Feb. 2019, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30535398.
  6. Lee, Joon-Goo, et al. “Effects of Grilling Procedures on Levels of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Grilled Meats.” Food Chemistry, U.S. National Library of Medicine, 15 May 2016, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26776018.
  7. Hamidi, Elliyana Nadia, et al. “Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Their Bioaccessibility in Meat: a Tool for Assessing Human Cancer Risk.” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP, U.S. National Library of Medicine, 2016, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26838201.
  8. Gibis, Monika, et al. “Impact of Different Pan-Frying Conditions on the Formation of Heterocyclic Aromatic Amines and Sensory Quality in Fried Bacon.” Food Chemistry, U.S. National Library of Medicine, 1 Feb. 2015, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25172724.
  9. Grosso, Giuseppe, et al. “Health Risk Factors Associated with Meat, Fruit and Vegetable Consumption in Cohort Studies: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis.” PloS One, Public Library of Science, 29 Aug. 2017, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5574618/.
  10. Alexander, D D, and C A Cushing. “Red Meat and Colorectal Cancer: a Critical Summary of Prospective Epidemiologic Studies.” Obesity Reviews : an Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, U.S. National Library of Medicine, May 2011, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20663065.
  11. Murray, S, et al. “Effect of Cruciferous Vegetable Consumption on Heterocyclic Aromatic Amine Metabolism in Man.” Carcinogenesis, U.S. National Library of Medicine, Sept. 2001, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11532863.
  12. Tannenbaum, S R. “Preventive Action of Vitamin C on Nitrosamine Formation.” International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research. Supplement = Internationale Zeitschrift Fur Vitamin- Und Ernahrungsforschung. Supplement, U.S. National Library of Medicine, 1989, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2507690.
  13. Hord, Norman G, et al. “Food Sources of Nitrates and Nitrites: the Physiologic Context for Potential Health Benefits.” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, U.S. National Library of Medicine, July 2009, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19439460.
  14. Gibis, Monika, and Jochen Weiss. “Inhibitory Effect of Marinades with Hibiscus Extract on Formation of Heterocyclic Aromatic Amines and Sensory Quality of Fried Beef Patties.” Meat Science, U.S. National Library of Medicine, Aug. 2010, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20418021.
  15. Melo, Armindo, et al. “Effect of Beer/Red Wine Marinades on the Formation of Heterocyclic Aromatic Amines in Pan-Fried Beef.” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, U.S. National Library of Medicine, 26 Nov. 2008, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18950185.
  16. Gibis, Monika. “Effect of Oil Marinades with Garlic, Onion, and Lemon Juice on the Formation of Heterocyclic Aromatic Amines in Fried Beef Patties.” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, U.S. National Library of Medicine, 12 Dec. 2007, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17988088.
  17. Smith, J S, et al. “Effect of Marinades on the Formation of Heterocyclic Amines in Grilled Beef Steaks.” Journal of Food Science, U.S. National Library of Medicine, Aug. 2008, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19241593.
  18. Hooda, Jagmohan, et al. “Heme, an Essential Nutrient from Dietary Proteins, Critically Impacts Diverse Physiological and Pathological Processes.” Nutrients, MDPI, 13 Mar. 2014, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3967179/.
  19. Torti, Suzy V. “Iron and Cancer.” Annual Reviews, www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-nutr-082117-051732.
  20. Bastide, Nadia M, et al. “Heme Iron from Meat and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: a Meta-Analysis and a Review of the Mechanisms Involved.” Cancer Prevention Research (Philadelphia, Pa.), U.S. National Library of Medicine, Feb. 2011, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21209396.
  21. Institute of Medicine (US) Panel on Micronutrients. “Iron.” Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin A, Vitamin K, Arsenic, Boron, Chromium, Copper, Iodine, Iron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Silicon, Vanadium, and Zinc., U.S. National Library of Medicine, 1 Jan. 1970, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK222309/.
  22. Bou, Ricard, et al. “Effect of Heating Oxyhemoglobin and Methemoglobin on Microsomes Oxidation.” Meat Science, U.S. National Library of Medicine, May 2010, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20374863.
  23. Oellingrath, Inger M. “Heat Degradation of Heme in Methemoglobin and Metmyoglobin Model Systems Measured by Reversed‐Phase Ion‐Pair High Performance Liquid Chromatography.” Wiley Online Library, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 25 Aug. 2006, onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1988.tb10173.x.
  24. Schaer, Dominik J, et al. “Hemolysis and Free Hemoglobin Revisited: Exploring Hemoglobin and Hemin Scavengers as a Novel Class of Therapeutic Proteins.” Blood, American Society of Hematology, 21 Feb. 2013, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23264591/.
  25. de Oliveira Otto, Marcia C, et al. “Dietary Intakes of Zinc and Heme Iron from Red Meat, but Not from Other Sources, Are Associated with Greater Risk of Metabolic Syndrome and Cardiovascular Disease.” The Journal of Nutrition, American Society for Nutrition, Mar. 2012, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22259193.
  26. McLean, Erin, et al. “Worldwide Prevalence of Anaemia, WHO Vitamin and Mineral Nutrition Information System, 1993-2005.” Public Health Nutrition, U.S. National Library of Medicine, Apr. 2009, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18498676.
  27. Malczewska-Lenczowska, Jadwiga. “Prevalence of Iron Deficiency in Male Elite Athletes.” ResearchGate, 2009, 
  28. McClung, James P. “Iron Status and the Female Athlete.” Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology : Organ of the Society for Minerals and Trace Elements (GMS), U.S. National Library of Medicine, June 2012, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22572041.
  29. Ferguson, Lynnette R. “Meat and Cancer.” Meat Science, Elsevier, 23 June 2009, www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0309174009001764.
  30. Micha, Renata, et al. “Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk of Incident Coronary Heart Disease, Stroke, and Diabetes Mellitus: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Circulation, U.S. National Library of Medicine, 1 June 2010, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20479151.
  31. Wang, Xia, et al. “Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Mortality: Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.” Public Health Nutrition, U.S. National Library of Medicine, Apr. 2016, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26143683.
  32. Rohrmann, Sabine, and Jakob Linseisen. “Processed Meat: the Real Villain?” The Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, U.S. National Library of Medicine, Aug. 2016, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26621069.
  33. Kim, Seong Rae, et al. “Effect of Red, Processed, and White Meat Consumption on the Risk of Gastric Cancer: An Overall and Dose⁻Response Meta-Analysis.” Nutrients, MDPI, 11 Apr. 2019, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30979076.
  34. Chen, G-C, et al. “Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk of Stroke: a Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.” European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, U.S. National Library of Medicine, Jan. 2013, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23169473.
  35. Maki, Kevin C., et al. “A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials That Compare the Lipid Effects of Beef versus Poultry and/or Fish Consumption.” Journal of Clinical Lipidology, Elsevier, 21 Jan. 2012, www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1933287412000153.
  36. Connor, et al. “Total Red Meat Intake of ≥0.5 Servings/d Does Not Negatively Influence Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors: a Systemically Searched Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.” OUP Academic, Oxford University Press, 23 Nov. 2016, academic.oup.com/ajcn/article/105/1/57/4633933.
  37. Guasch-Ferré, Marta, et al. “Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Red Meat Consumption in Comparison With Various Comparison Diets on Cardiovascular Risk Factors.” Circulation, U.S. National Library of Medicine, 9 Apr. 2019, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30958719.
  38. Bergeron, et al. “Effects of Red Meat, White Meat, and Nonmeat Protein Sources on Atherogenic Lipoprotein Measures in the Context of Low Compared with High Saturated Fat Intake: a Randomized Controlled Trial.” OUP Academic, Oxford University Press, 4 June 2019, academic.oup.com/ajcn/article/110/1/24/5494812.
  39. O’Connor, et al. “Effects of Total Red Meat Consumption on Glycemic Control and Inflammation: A Systematically Searched Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Randomized Controlled Trials (OR22-08-19).” OUP Academic, Oxford University Press, 13 June 2019, academic.oup.com/cdn/article/3/Supplement_1/nzz028.OR22-08-19/5516820.
  40. “Should Dietary Guidelines Recommend Low Red Meat Intake?” Taylor & Francis, www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10408398.2019.1657063.
  41. Händel, Mina Nicole, et al. “Processed Meat Intake and Chronic Disease Morbidity and Mortality: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.” PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0223883.
  42. Johnston, Bradley C., et al. “Unprocessed Red Meat and Processed Meat Consumption: Dietary Guideline Recommendations From the Nutritional Recommendations (NutriRECS) Consortium.” Annals of Internal Medicine, American College of Physicians, 19 Nov. 2019, annals.org/aim/fullarticle/2752328/unprocessed-red-meat-processed-meat-consumption-dietary-guideline-recommendations-from
  43. Granic . “Myoprotective Whole Foods, Muscle Health and Sarcopenia: A Systematic Review of Observational and Intervention Studies in Older Adults.” Nutrients, U.S. National Library of Medicine, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32731580/.

  44. Maximova, Katerina, et al. “Co-Consumption of Vegetables and Fruit, Whole Grains, and Fiber Reduces the Cancer Risk of Red and Processed Meat in a Large Prospective Cohort of Adults from Alberta’s Tomorrow Project.” Nutrients, MDPI, 29 July 2020, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7468967/.
  45. Dobersek, Urska. “Meat and Mental Health: A Meta-Analysis of Meat Consumption, Depression, and Anxiety.” Taylor & Francis, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10408398.2021.1974336.

Want to Learn More About Getting Your Dream Body?

Sign up for AwesomeFitnessScience Weekly. You’ll get juicy insider secrets, updates, and stories.

Is MSG Bad For Your Health?

MSG is often criticized for numerous health detriments. Some claims include headache, sweating, heart palpations, burning sensations, nausea, brain toxicity, asthma, liver damage, and the death of all your pets.

Read More »